Is
It True What They Say About FreeMasonry?
The Methods of Anti-Masons
(Second Edition, Revised)
Art deHoyos and S. Brent
Morris With a Foreword and Addendum by
James T. Tresner II
|
Masonic Information Center TEL 301-588-4010 / FAX 301-608-3457 |
Dedicated to the memory of
John Jamieson Robinson
Researcher • Author • Master Mason
| The
worst readers are those who proceed like plundering soldiers:
they pick up a few things they use, soil and confuse the rest,
and blaspheme the whole. --Friedrich Nietzsche, Mixed Opinions and Maxims I am appalled, I am bound to say, by the unsolicited material that has been sent to me...prior to this debate. What beggars my imagination is the way in which anyone, for whatever sort of malicious or neurotic or malicious [sic] reason, who writes anything denouncing freemasonry is assumed by some to be telling the truth. They are not. We have seen it in public life and we have seen it here. The Church should be different.... I am ashamed when fellow Christians are so gullible and so uncharitable, and that is putting it charitably. --Canon
R. Lewis (not a Mason), speaking to Quoted
in Christopher Haffner, Workman Unashamed
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Chapter One:
- The Methods of Anti-Masons
- The Organization of Masonry
- The Issue of Masonic "Experts"
- Albert Pike and Lucifer
- Some Accounts of Taxil's Hoax About Freemasonry and Lucifer
- Some Anti-Masonic Books Using Taxil's Hoax About Freemasonry and Lucifer
- Léo Taxil's False Luciferian Quotation of Albert Pike
- Morals and Dogma
- Chapter Two: Anti-Masonry in the Electronic
Age
- Chapter Three: John Ankerberg and John
Weldon, "The Secret Teachings of the Masonic Lodge"
- Chapter Four: The Reverend Ron Carlson
and "Christian Ministries International"
- Chapter Five: The Reverend James D.
Shaw and "The Deadly Deception"
- Chapter Six: T.N. (Skip) Sampson and
"Cornerstone Ministries"
- Chapter Seven: Falsus in Multus, Falsus
in Omnibus
- Epilogue: The Fruits of Anti-Masonry:
Garden of Evil? / Stones of Evil
- Addendum:Please Look a Little
Closer
- Bibliography:Works Cited
Mrs. Inge Baum, retired Librarian of the Supreme Council 33º, S.J., for her always gracious assistance.
Bro. David Blackey Board, for his detailed research on and bibliography of Léo Taxil.
Bro. John W. Boettjer, for his permission to use the articles "Garden of Evil?" and "Stones of Evil."
Bro. Roger Kessinger, Kessinger Publishing Co., for permission to use extended quotations from The Cloud of Prejudice: A Study in Anti-Masonry, by Art deHoyos.
Bro. Irwin Kirby, General Secretary, Valley of Miami, A.&A.S.R., for information on Rev. James D. Shaw's Scottish Rite membership in Florida.
Ms. Joan Kleinknecht, Librarian of the Supreme Council 33º, S.J., for her kind assistance.
Bro. Rollin O. Simpson, Grand Secretary, Grand Lodge of Indiana, F.&A.M., for information on Rev. James D. Shaw's Masonic membership in Indiana.
Bro. Eric Serejski, for his assistance in translating passages from Le Femme et L'Enfant dans le Franc-Maçonnerie Universelle.
Bro. Arthur Schechner, Secretary, West Dade Lodge No. 388, for information on Rev. James D. Shaw's membership in Allapattah Lodge No. 271.
Bro. William G. Wolf, Grand Secretary, Grand Lodge of Florida, F.&.A.M., for information on Rev. James D. Shaw's Masonic membership in Florida.
Bros. Sidney Baxter, John W. Boettjer, Richard Curtis, Richard E. Fletcher, Wallace McLeod, Pete Normand, James T. Tresner, II, and Thomas E. Weir for their invaluable textual corrections and suggestions.
It is not an unmixed blessing, being asked to write a foreword for this book.
On the one hand, it is a high honor to be asked to contribute a few words to the work of Masons I so greatly respect. Art deHoyos and Brent Morris are two of the very best Masonic writers Freemasonry has produced in a long time.
On the other hand, some tasks are simply distasteful, no matter how exalted the company in which they are done. (Unstopping a clogged toilet springs to mind as an example.) Dealing with the attacks of anti-Masons is a similarly distasteful task, for similar reasons.
It is a sense of betrayal which makes me so personally angry with some of these individuals. I came of age in a time when policemen were your friends, your father knew best, and ministers lived by high moral codes. And I still believe that.
But it's getting harder.
St. Luke says (16:10) "Whoever is faithful in a very little is faithful also in much; and whoever is dishonest in a very little is dishonest also in much."
As you will see in this book, anti-Masons are often dishonest in both little and much.
That's the betrayal! I don't expect a banker to steal my money, I don't expect a physician to prescribe poison, and I don't expect a minister to lie to me.
And these men do lie. They are not innocently mistaken; they are not led into error; they are not merely confused. They lie.
Suppose Brent Morris writes a letter to me, and he writes, "I don't think Art deHoyos is stupid." And, later in the letter, he writes, "I was watching one of our local politicians on television last night, and I was strongly reminded of the line by the ancient poet-philosopher, Sadi, 'Verily, he is like a jack-ass among men, a calf, a body which is bleating.'"
Then I sit down and write a letter to Art deHoyos, with Brent's letter in front of me, and I write, "Dear Brother deHoyos, I got a letter today in which Brent Morris wrote, 'I . . . think Art is stupid.' 'He is like a jack-ass among men.'"
If I do that, I have told deliberate, malicious lies. And if I add to my letter, "so you can see what Brent really thinks about you," I have lied again.
Bear that in mind as you read the examples of what anti-Masons do when "quoting" Masonic writers.
Dishonest in little-dishonest in much.
To sell a book, or a tape, claiming it reveals truth while knowing it to contain lies is cheating. Soliciting or accepting contributions in the name of truth while telling a lie is stealing.
It's hard for us to believe that of men of the cloth. But when a man presents us, in writing, with repeated proof of his deceit, we ultimately must conclude that he is deceitful.
This book is not intended to be an exhaustive defense of Freemasonry. None is needed. It is intended to show, by example, just what anti-Masons are capable of doing.
There may be some readers who, in spite of the proof of the lies told by the anti-Masons examined in this book (and in spite of the fact that they can get the original sources themselves and check them out if they doubt the integrity of Brothers deHoyos and Morris), still continue to believe in the honor and integrity of the anti-Masons. If so, there is little that can be said to them.
But for readers who resent being lied to and resent even more the implication that they are too stupid to know the difference, this book will come as something of a revelation.
What motivates such men? Part of it may simply be unreasoning hatred. But a very large part of it can be explained in financial terms. Anti-Masons are fond of selling audio and video tapes. One can do a video tape, even in fairly small quantities, for about $5, and that includes the cost of the tape, its reproduction, a sturdy hinged plastic case, and a color title card for the box; an audio tape costs about $1.25. Since these earnest entrepreneurs sell their video tapes for $2030 and their audio tapes for $56, there is a useful bit of change left over.
Freemasonry, therefore, is a profitable target.
It is not that Freemasonry considers itself above criticism. It is a human institution and, like all such institutions, imperfect and open to improvement. Criticize us if you wish--most Masons do. Examine us in depth--we have nothing to hide.
But do not lie about us.
And, especially, do not lie about us and then dare to claim you are doing the work of God.
Master Mason
In the three short years since the first edition of this work was published we have received an overwhelmingly positive response from the majority of our readers, to whom we extend our sincere appreciation. We have also heard from a few anti-Masonic detractors who have accused us of both insincerity and a motivation to write this work for personal financial gain. These charges are completely unfounded. As we wrote in the first edition, we are willing to admit to and correct any verifiable errors if provided with proper documentation. We also hasten to add that neither of the authors receives any royalties or financial remuneration in consideration of this work.
This second, enlarged edition includes updates, new material and several new chapters.
One of the most contested matters relative to the first edition concerns the allegations of the late Rev. James D. Shaw. Among the many claims in his anti-Masonic book The Deadly Deception, was his alleged reception of an Honorary Thirty-third Degree from the Scottish Rite, Southern Jurisdiction. As will be seen, co-author Tom McKenney now admits that the emphasis on Rev. Shaw's alleged status as a "top leader" was a marketing ploy. We will provide additional documentation and evidence demonstrating that Rev. Shaw lied about this, as well as other aspects of his Masonic standing and career. A lengthy correspondence related to the matter is also included.
The increased popularity of the Internet and the World Wide Web has not only provided Freemasonry with a ready medium to disseminate information, but also allows anti-Masons the opportunity of spreading misinformation. It is notable that most of Freemasonry's critics prefer to hide under a cloak anonymity on the Internet, such as Enchanter!, an anti-Mason whose criticisms are also herein addressed.
This edition includes a more detailed examination of the tactics used by John Ankerberg and John Weldon in their anti-Masonic book, The Secret Teachings of the Masonic Lodge: A Christian Perspective. Since our first edition was published they have made some alterations to their book, but failed to publicly acknowledge their errors.
A sad and distressing example of the "fruits" of anti-Masonry appears in the epilogue which contains two articles, "The Garden of Evil?" and "Stones of Evil," kindly provided by Bro. John Boettjer. These articles are a poignant reminder that the innocent are most often the victims of brutal, ignorant and superstitious fanaticism.
Freemasonry is a unique human institution, generating deep loyalty in its members and great misunderstandings among its detractors. It is difficult for some people to imagine that a group of men meeting behind closed doors could be doing anything good, much less encouraging each other to live lives of greater religious, family, and civic service. And yet this is what Freemasons have done since at least 1717, when the premier grand lodge was formed in London.
Recent critics, however, have gone beyond stating their differences with the Craft to fabricating vicious lies to defame the fraternity and its members. These detractors have convinced themselves that Freemasonry is the work of the devil. Thus they apparently justify their perversions of truth with the thought that they are doing the Lord's work--saving an unsuspecting world from Satan. No misquotation, no distortion, no lie is too great to accomplish what they perceive as their holy mission. All this is done in the name of Him who said, "I am the way, the truth, and the life" (John 14:18).
Freemasonry teaches its members tolerance, even of its assailants. The normal Masonic response to detractors has been to turn the other cheek, letting them wallow in their own ignorance. The maliciousness and deceitfulness of current attacks have grown to the point, however, that some reasoned reply is needed. It is not too demanding to expect the critics of Freemasonry to state their credentials accurately or to quote Masonic authors correctly and in context. Surely that is being faithful in very little. The hatred of some anti-Masons is so great, however, that even this little faithfulness is too much.
This book points out several common misrepresentations made about Freemasonry and shows specific examples of willful fraud. We do not attempt to answer every charge, because this is an ultimately fruitless task. Anyone willing to overlook the easily verified lies presented here can just as easily rationalize away whatever other corruption they might encounter.
We have tried to be scrupulous in citing our sources and in accurately representing the exact words and context of quotations. Despite our best efforts, it will not surprise us if inadvertent errors have crept into our text. All mistakes of quotation and citation will be acknowledged and will be corrected in subsequent editions of this work. Please send such errors to the Masonic Service Association of the U.S., 8120 Fenton St., Silver Spring, MD 20910-4785.
We hope this book will give pause to fair-minded readers who may be caught in the headlong rush to condemn Freemasonry. The evidence presented here calls into question the research abilities of many Masonic critics as well as their integrity.
A.H. & S.B.M.
THE METHODS OF ANTI-MASONS
But he that filches from
me my good name
Robs me of that which not enriches him
And makes me poor indeed.
--Othello, Act III, Scene
3
William Shakespeare
It's hard to pinpoint which arguments a particular anti-Mason will try to use, but there are popular ploys that continue to pop up regularly. Some have been around for a long time, others seem to follow sound logic, but all are flawed. Nevertheless, these ploys are just too tempting to opponents of Masonry not to use. Most of these lies have been repeated so often that it's relatively easy to find them in print somewhere. Their reasoning seems to be, "Why do serious research when with little effort you can find any answer needed to support your position?"
Dr. Robert A. Morey, an anti-Masonic researcher, has a low opinion of the standards of research used by his fellow anti-Masons.
Anti-masonic writers have generally been as unreliable as Masonic apologists. In their zeal to attack Freemasonry, they have been willing to use fantasy, fraud, and deceit. They have even created bogus documents when needed. Their writings must not be taken at face value. (1)
In this work we exhibit examples of fantasy, fraud, and deceit, all used to attack Freemasonry in the name of Christianity. We hope readers will pause to consider what motivates some men to use such methods.
The
Organization of Masonry
Any discussion of Masonic government must start and end
with one essential fact: all Masonic authority originates in a grand
lodge. The Masonic Service Association of the United States (M.S.A.)
has no authority over grand lodges. No Supreme Council, no respected
author, nor any other group or person speaks for or controls Masonry;
that prerogative rests solely with the grand lodges. Anyone doubting
this need only check the cases when grand lodges have closed down the
Scottish Rite, the Shrine, and other appendant Masonic bodies in their
states or suspended or expelled their "high officials." It
is a rare but powerful reminder of who is in charge.
Generally speaking, the United States, Canada, Australia, Mexico, and Brazil have autonomous grand lodges in each state or province while other countries have an independent national grand lodge. Within its boundaries or "jurisdiction," each grand lodge reigns supreme over its lodges and all appendant Masonic organizations. The only control or influence over a grand lodge comes from the influence by persuasion of its sister grand lodges which maintain a network of mutual recognition.
If a grand lodge strays too far from accepted Masonic norms, other grand lodges will withdraw recognition and will even help organize a new grand lodge in the jurisdiction. The most famous example occurred in 1877 when the "Grand Orient of France" (which functioned as a grand lodge) dropped the requirements that its members believe in God and that its lodges display an open Volume of Sacred Law. This action caused the withdrawal of recognition by virtually every other regular grand lodge and the creation of the "Grand Lodge of France." Later concerns that the Grand Lodge of France was not truly independent of the Scottish Rite Supreme Council of France led to the establishment of the "National Grand Lodge of France," which today is recognized by American, British, and other grand lodges as the regular Masonic authority in France.
Just as there is nothing to prevent a group of worshipers from calling itself "Baptist" or "Presbyterian" or "Jewish," there is nothing to prevent a group of men (or women) from calling itself "Masonic." It is hardly fair to judge the world of regular Masonry by the statements of irregular groups that have appropriated the name "Mason."
Consider the case of the notorious "P2 Lodge" in Italy which was largely responsible for the collapse of the Italian government in 1981. Propaganda Lodge No. 2, Propaganda Due, or "P2" as it became known, began as a legitimately chartered lodge. Within the short space of a few years, however, its Master, Licio Gelli, abused his authority by using his Masonic influence to gain favors. Geli used illicit information to blackmail people into joining his lodge, the purpose of which was to gather more intelligence for his personal political agenda. Members of P2 then became involved in criminal activities.
As soon as the Grand Orient of Italy (the equivalent of an American grand lodge) became aware of a problem, its leaders tried to rectify the situation and, unfortunately, failed. Gelli would be controlled by no one. The Grand Orient then administered the ultimate Masonic punishment: revocation of the lodge's charter and expulsion of its members.
The former members of P2, however, ignored the judgment of the Grand Orient to whom they had pledged fealty and continued meeting under their old name. The "lodge" was now irregular or illegitimate, operating without authority. In 1975 a regular Mason, Francesco Siniscalchi, complained to the Public Prosecutor in Rome of P2's nefarious activities. When the scandal eventually broke, the press--and many non-Masons--did not understand the illegitimacy of P2, nor the fact that legitimate Masons tried to rectify the problem. This failure to differentiate between regular Masonry and the irregular P2 tarnished the good name of Masonry.
The ultimate tests of regularity (greatly simplified) are 1) does a grand lodge directly trace its origins through legitimate authority to one of the British grand lodges, and 2) does it maintain the recognition of most of the community of regular grand lodges, including the British grand lodges? If an organization doesn't pass these tests, then it's not Masonic, despite what it may call itself.
The most common mistake about the organization of Masonry comes from assuming that Supreme Councils of the Scottish Rite control Masonry. This is not true. There is no Masonic degree "higher" than the Third Degree or Master Mason Degree in symbolic Masonry. While the number 33 may be greater than the number 3, a 33° Mason has no more authority or power in a lodge than a 3° Mason. Both are equally subordinate to the Master of their lodge, and all in turn are subordinate to the Grand Master of their grand lodge. An earlier statement bears repeating:
No Supreme Council, no respected author, nor any other group or person speaks for or controls Masonry; that prerogative rests solely with the grand lodges.
You can be sure something is wrong if anyone says that a single person or organization speaks for or represents Masonry. Only a grand lodge has that power and then only within its jurisdiction. Any other assertion displays a fatally flawed understanding of the organization of Freemasonry.
The
Issue of Masonic "Experts"
Thousands of authors have written about Freemasonry and several have
achieved wide recognition for their general scholarship. Other Masonic
authors have pursued theories that at best are without factual support
and at worst are embarrassingly wrong. Because Freemasonry values free
thought so highly, grand lodges as a rule neither endorse nor condemn
ideas; that decision is left to individual Masons. Thus it is quite
possible to find otherwise highly regarded Masonic authors who have
espoused ideas of Masonic origins or symbolism that are without substance--ideas
that have been politely ignored and have been allowed to quietly fade
away. Unless formally endorsed by action of a grand lodge, no writer
can speak for Masonry, only for himself.
Dr. Robert A. Morey, a Christian critic of Freemasonry, noted, "Another error typically made by anti-Masons is the assumption that Freemasonry is based on the writings of a single individual. They usually pick Albert Pike as the official 'spokesman' of Freemasonry."(2) If not Albert Pike, then their choice might be Albert Mackey(3) or Manley Palmer Hall(4) or some other author espousing his personal theories about Masonry.
-
Most anti-Masonic writers are
far too gullible in believing the extravagant claims of overzealous,
misinformed, or devious Masonic writers who have not done Freemasonry
a favor by making outlandish statements which provided much fodder
for the guns of the anti-Masons.
Too many masonic writers have arrogantly claimed that they speak for the whole Craft when they give their personal interpretation of the origin and symbols of Freemasonry. (5)
For example, Manly Hall didn't become a Mason until 1954, so his 1923 book, Lost Keys of Freemasonry, represents the personal theories of a non-Mason. Further, Mr. Hall (who passed away in August 1990) was a self-avowed mystic and not a "leading authority" of Freemasonry. He was a promulgator of mystic and theosophical philosophies; his writings have not received official sanction by any Masonic bodies. The fact that he held the Thirty-third Degree and was respected by many Thirty-Third Degree Masons and even by the Supreme Councils 33º is no more significant than the fact that various Baptist, Anglican, or Methodist authors also hold or held that honor.
Anti-Masons regularly parade the writings of Masonic authorities before their audiences and dissect their words, looking for a sentence here or a phrase there to be used in their cause. They seek someone like a church authority who speaks dogmatically on teachings and doctrine; whose every word must be accepted by the faithful.
Freemasonry has no such authorities.
The Masonic authorities used by anti-Masons have been historical authorities who speak with the expertise that comes from long study, but who do not--indeed, cannot--speak for all Masons. It is like the difference between the authoritative teachings of the Episcopal Church and an authoritative history of the Kennedy assasination.
Albert
Pike and Lucifer
No other lie has captured the imagination of anti-Masons quite like
Léo Taxil's hoax concerning Albert Pike and Lucifer. Dr. Robert
A. Morey parts company with most of his fellow anti-Masons on this issue.
Of all the attacks against the Craft, none is so vicious as the charge that Masons are a secret cult of Devil worshipers or Satanists and that at some point in the higher degrees they must pass through a Luciferian initiation.(6)
Once anti-Masons have convinced themselves that Freemasonry is the work of Satan, they are ripe to be tempted by the enticing fruit of the "Luciferian Conspiracy." It comes as a quotation that usually starts, "On July 14, 1889, Albert Pike, Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry, addressed to the 23 Supreme Confederated Councils of the world the following instructions. . . ." That is all you need to read to know the author has fallen prey to this infamous hoax.
It's not entirely certain when the Pike quotation was fabricated nor where it was first published. We can, however, trace its modern appearances to Lady Queenborough, Edith Starr Miller, who wrote Occult Theocrasy in 1933. Her work is excerpted and treated as gospel truth, usually without attribution. Such practices are known as plagiarism in other disciplines, but neither serious research nor intellectual integrity stand in the way of the headlong rush to slander Freemasonry.
Lady Queenborough found her quotation in the 1894 book by Abel Clarin de la Rive, La Femme et L'Enfant dans la Franc-Maçonnerie Universelle (Woman and Child in Universal Freemasonry). Mr. de la Rive, like Lady Queenborough, was duped by the hoax; they are guilty only of incompetent research and an eager willingness to believe the worst about Freemasonry. The ultimate source was the pornographer, anti-Mason, and anti-Catholic Gabriel Antoine Jogand-Pagès, much better known by his pen name Léo Taxil. Taxil publicly confessed his deception in 1897; his story is widely available for anyone willing to look for the truth.
| Figure 1. Albert Pike (1809-1891), Grand Commander of the Supreme Council, 33º, Southern Jurisdiction, USA., 1859-1891, slandered by Léo Taxil as the author of the false "Luciferian Doctrine" of Freemasonry. |
| Figure 2. Léo Taxil (Gabriel Antoine Jogand-Pagès) (1854-1907), anti-Mason, anti-Catholic, and pornographer, who created an elaborate hoax falsely linking Freemasonry and devil worship, the purpose of which was to defame the fraternity and to embarrass the Catholic church. |
| Figure 3. Cover of The Mysteries of Freemasonry, another of Taxil's anti-Masonic Books. The cover is typical of the lurid illustrations used to attract readers to the scurrilous "revelation" of Masonic Lodge activities. |
Here are just a few of the authors who have reported the bogus Lucifer quotation ascribed to Albert Pike as evidence of the moral depravity of Masonry.
Some of these authors, like the Reverend Pat Robertson, simply quote Lady Queenborough's translation without attribution. Others, like Dr. James Holly and Martin Short have used the quotation accompanied by equivocations they must think absolve them from responsibility for repeating lies. For example, this is how Dr. Holly tried to cover himself when he quoted Mr. de la Rive.
In the late nineteenth century many antimasonic books were written, purporting to be written by Masons. Some have argued that this is one such book. There is no conclusive evidence either way.(7)
Employing less ambiguous terms than Dr. Holly, Martin Short admitted there were "problems" with the bogus quote, but he too felt no compunction against using it.
There are problems with this
quotation: its meaning is not immediately clear and its authenticity
is in doubt. It was first attributed to Pike in 1894 by a French authoress
who detested Freemasonry, yet no original text seems to exist. Genuine
or not, England's Grand Lodge dismisses it by pointing out Pike must
have been eighty at the time and "may have been dotty."
Yet the quote sounds authentic. Its
pyrotechnic language and bombastic poesy recalls Pike's earlier
writings, and the message is not so different from that of Morals
and Dogma. If genuine, it indicates there is a Satanic--or
Luciferian--strain in American Masonry....(8)
The public confession of Taxil and the subsequent recantation by Mr. de la Rive do not seem conclusive enough for Dr. Holly, Mr. Short and their ilk.
Mr. Jack Chick showed some clever originality in his use of the bogus Albert Pike "quote" in the 1991 edition of his comic book, The Curse of Baphomet. Rather than plagiarizing Lady Queenborough, as have so many of his allies, he used a fictitious reference to a legitimate publication: "'The Freemason' (the organ of English Freemasonry), 19th January, 1935"!(9) Although he has removed the fictitious reference from current editions, the bogus quote remains.
| Figure 4. A fictitious reference to a legitimate Masonic publication demonstrates the zeal of anti-Masons in using the discredited Taxil fabrication. Following an exposure of this deception, the reference was changed but the bogus quote remains. From Jack T. Chick, The Curse of Baphomet (Chino, Calif.: Chick Publications, 1991, 1996), pp. [11,12]. |
Mr. C. Fred Kleinknecht, Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite, Southern Jurisdiction, U.S.A., wrote to Rev. Pat Robertson on May 12, 1992. The Albert Pike "quotation" in Robertson's The New World Order was exposed as a fraud. Rev. Robertson was invited to read any of Albert Pike's writings at the House of the Temple. Mr. Kleinknecht suggested that Rev. Robertson would better serve his readers if he removed the false quotation from any future editions of his book. In his closing paragraph, Mr. Kleinknecht said to Rev. Robertson, "If we must disagree let us base our disagreement upon truth."(10) As of November 1, 1993, Rev. Robertson has not answered Mr. Kleinknecht.
Before commenting on the hoax, the complete quotation from Mr. de la Rive, a modern translation, and its partial translation by Lady Queenborough are presented in parallel columns for easy comparison.
Abel Clarin de la Rive. La Femme et L'Enfant dans la Franc-Maçonnerie Universelle. Paris & Lyon: Delhomme & Briguet, Editeurs, 1894. pp. 587-589 Le quatorzième jour du cinquième mois de l'an 000889 de la Vraie Lumière (Par conséquent le 14 juillet 1889, ère vulgaire) Albert Pike, Souverain-Grand-Inspecteur Général, 33º et dernier degré; Très Puissant Souverain Commandeur Grand-Maître du Suprême Conseil de Charleston, premier Suprême Conseil du Globe; Grand Maître Conservateur du Palladium sacré; Souverain Pontife de la Franc-Maçonnerie Universelle, en la trente-unième [sic] année de son Pontificat, adressait aux 23 Suprêmes Conseils Confédérés du monde entier ces diaboliques instructions dont nous n'extrayons que les passages relatifs à la Femme: «A la science de Faust, le vrai
Maçon joindra l'impassibilité de Job. Il piétinera
la supersitition dans son coeur. Il sera sans indécision et sans
caprices. Il n'acceptera le plaisir que losqu'il le voudra et ne le voudra
que losqu'il le devra.
... ...
A vous, Souverains Grands Inspecteurs Généraux, Nous disons, pour que vous le répétiez aux Frères des 32º, 31º et 30º degrés: --La religion maçonnique doit dire, par nous tous, initiés des hauts grades, maintenue dans la pureté de la doctraine LUCIFÉRIENNE.» ... ... «Si Lucifer n'était point Dieu, Adonaï, (le Dieu des Chrétiens) dont tous les actes attestent la cruauté, la perfidie, la haine de l'homme, la barbarie, la répulsion pour la science, si Lucifer n'était point Dieu, Adonaï et ses prêtres le calomnieraient-ils? «Oui, Lucifer est Dieu, et malheureusement Adonaï l'est aussi. Car la loi éternelle est qu'il n'y a pas de splendeur sans ombre, pas de beauté sans laideur, pas de blanc sans noir, car l'absolu ne peut exister que comme deux; car les ténèbres sont nécessaires à la lumière pour lui servir de repoussoir, comme le piédestal est nécessaire à la statue, come le frein à la locomotive. «En dynamique analogique et universelle, on ne s'appuie que sur ce qui résiste. Aussi l'univers est-il balancé par deux forces qui le maintiennent en équilibre: la force qui attire et celle qui repousse. Ces deux forces existent en physique, en philosophie et en religion. Et la réalité scientifique du dualisme divin est démontrée par les phénomènes de la polarité et par la loi universelle des sympathies et des antipathies. C'est pourquoi les disciples intelligents de Zoroastre, ainsi qu'après eux les Gnostiques, les Manichéens, les Templiers ont admis, comme seule conception métaphysique logique, le système des deux principles divins se combattant de toute éternité, et l'on ne peut croire l'un inférieur à l'autre en puissance. Donc, la doctrine du Satinisme est une hérésie; et la vraie et pure religion philosophique, c'est la croyance en Lucifer, égal d'Adonaï, mais Lucifer Dieu de Lumière et Dieu du Bien, luttant pour l'humanité contre Adonaï Dieu des Ténèbres et Dieu du Mal....»
«C'est avec le plus grand soin qu'il est nécessaire de choisir les adeptes. Dans beucoup d'orients, on les prend trop au hasard; aussi tardons-nous à atteindre le but. «Ne conférez la Maîtrise qu'au Compagnon qui se connait lui-mème. Sur le fronton des anciens temples érigés au Dieu de la Lumière, on lisait cette inscription en deux mots: «Connaistoi.» Nous donnons le même conseil à tout homme qui veut s'approcher de la science. «N'initiez jamais au troisième degré l'homme qui, malgré les enseignements reçus aux deux grades précédents, est demeuré esclave des préjugés du monde profane. Il ne parviendra jamais tant qu'il ne se réformera pas. Au grade le Compagnon, vous lui ouvre: les portes des Loges d'Adoption; là, vous le jugerez bien. Vou verrez si ses préjugés tombent. S'il reste esclave de ses passions, s'il s'attache exclusivement a une femme, ne vous préoccupez plus de lui, vous perdriez votre temps. Il ne saurait être un adepte; car le mot «adepte» signifie celui qui est parvenu par sa volonté et par ses uvres, qui méprise les préjugés et qui triomphe de ses passions.»* *Ce fut la Sur Diana Vaughan qu'Albert Pike, --afin de lui donner la plus grande marque de confiance, --chargea d'apporter son encyclique luciférienne, à Paris, pendant l'Exposition Universelle. |
Abel Clarin de la Rive. Woman and Child in Universal Freemasonry. Paris & Lyon: Delhomme & Briguet, Editeurs, 1894. [translated by Eric Serejski] The fourteenth day of the fifth month of the 889th year of True Light (consequently July 14, 1889, of the vulgar era) Albert Pike, Sovereign Grand Inspector General, 33rd and last degree; Most Puissant Sovereign Commander Grand Master of the Supreme Council of Charleston, Premier Supreme Council of the Globe; Grand Master Preserver of the sacred Palladium; As Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry, in the thirty-first year of his Pontificate, he addressed to the 23 Confederated Supreme Councils of the entire world these diabolic instructions from which we extract only the passages related to Woman: "To the science of Faust, the
True Mason will join the impassiveness of Job. He will trample down superstition
in his heart. He will be without indecision and without whims, he will
accept pleasure only when he wants it and will want it only when he must."
... ...
"To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General, we say, so that you can repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st and 30th degrees: --The Masonic religion must be, by all of us initiates of the high grades, maintained in the purity of the LUCIFERIAN doctrine." ... ... "If Lucifer were not God, Adonai (the God of the Christians) whose deeds prove his cruelty, perfidy and hatred of man, his barbarism and repulsion of science, if Lucifer were not God, would Adonai and his priests slander him?" "Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately so is Adonai. For the eternal law is that there is no splendor without shadow, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, because the absolute can only exist as two, because darkness is necessary to light to serve as its compliment, as the pedestal is necessary to the statue, as the brake to the locomotive. "In analogical and universal dynamics, one can only lean on that which resists. Thus the universe is balanced by two forces which maintain its equilibrium: the force that attracts and the one that repels. These two forces exist in physics, in philosophy and in religion. And the scientific reality of the divine dualism is proved by the phenomena of polarity and by the universal law of affinities and antipathies. This is why the intelligent disciples of Zoroaster, as well as, after them, the Gnostics, the Manicheans, and the Templars have admitted as the sole logical and metaphysical conception the system of the two divine principles fighting one another in all eternity, and one cannot believe one inferior to the other in power. Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, equal to Adonai, but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is fighting for humanity against Adonai God of Darkness and God of Evil...."
It is with the greatest care that it is necessary to choose adepts. In many orients, they are taken too much at random, which explains the delay in reaching the goal."
"Never initiate to the third degree the man who, in spite of the learning received at the two preceding degrees, remains enslaved to the prejudices of the profane world. He will never approach before he reforms. At the Fellow Craft degree open to him the doors of the Lodges of Adoption; there you will well judge him. You will see if his prejudices fall. If he remains enslaved of his passions, IF HE EXCLUSIVELY BINDS HIMSELF TO A WOMAN, do not worry about him anymore, you are losing your time. He cannot be an adept; because the word "adept"signifies one who arrived by his will and by his deeds, one who despises prejudices and who triumphs over his passions."*
|
Lady Queensborough, Edith Starr Miller. Occult Theocrasy. 2 vols. 1933. Reprint. Hawthorne, Calif: The Christian Book Club of America. 1980. p. 233 As regards the position of women in Masonry, we think that this cannot be better explained than in the words of Albert Pike himself. In La Femme et l'Enfant dans la Franc- Maçonnerie Universelle page 578 [sic], A. C. De La Rive states that on July 14, 1889, Albert Pike, Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry, addressed to the 23 Supreme Confederated Councils of the world the following instructions, which we quote herewith in part.
pp. 220-221 The theological dogma of Albert Pike is explained in the "Instructions" issued by him, on July 14, 1889, to the 23 Supreme Councils of the world and have been recorded by A. C. De La Rive in La Femme et l'Enfant dans la Franc-Maçonnerie Universelle (page 588) from which book we translate the quote as follows: That which we must say to the crowd is:--We worship a God, but it is the God that one adores without superstition. To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st and 30th degrees-The Masonic religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine. ... ... "If Lucifer were not God, would Adonay (the God of the Christians) whose deeds prove his cruelty, perfidy, and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion for science, would Adonay and his priests, calumniate him? "Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also God. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two Gods: darkness being necessary to light to serve as its foil as the pedestal is necessary to the statue, and the brake to the locomotive. "In analogical and universal dynamics one can only lean on that which will resist. Thus the universe is balanced by two forces which maintain its equilibrium: the force of attraction and that of repulsion. These two forces exist in physics, philosophy and religion. And the scientific reality of the divine dualism is demonstrated by the phenomena of polarity and by the universal law of sympathies and antipathies. That is why the intelligent disciples of Zoroaster, as well as, after them, the Gnostics, the Manicheans and the Templars have admitted, as the only logical metaphysical conception, the system of the two divine principles fighting eternally, and one cannot believe the one inferior in power to the other. "Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophic religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil." "One must not lose sight of the fact that Pike occupied simultaneously the positions of Grand Master of the Central Directory of Washington, that of Grand Commander of the Supreme Council of Charleston and that of Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry. |
There are several problems with this
quotation, some obvious and some subtle. To start with, about 1 million
out of 2½ million American Masons have the 32° in the Scottish
Rite, including ministers, rabbis, bishops, and other devout worshipers
of God. It is inconceivable that there would not be mass resignations
and protests if these men were taught this disgusting "Luciferian
doctrine." Is it believable that the millions of Scottish Rite
Masons during the last two centuries could be cowed into such total
silence? Dr. Robert Morey, an opponent of Masonry, put it well, "Since
most Masons in the United States are members of Christian churches
and many clergymen belong to the Fraternity, the idea that they are
all involved in some kind of devil cult is absurd."(11)
Also, the quotation is riddled with logical inconsistencies. There is not now and never has been a position of "Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry." This office is Taxil's invention and alone demonstrates the letter is a forgery. There is no "Confederation of Supreme Councils." Neither Albert Pike, the Mother Supreme Council, nor any grand lodges ever recognized any lodges of adoption (Masonic lodges open to men and women). In the United States virtually every Scottish Rite Mason progresses to the 32°. Why would Albert Pike suggest special treatment for 30°, 31°, and 32° Masons, when that would have included nearly everyone?
The real evidence of a hoax comes in de la Rive's footnote, which neither Lady Queenborough nor anyone else has ever bothered quoting. The footnote refers to Diana Vaughan, the matchless creation of Léo Taxil's twisted mind, who, despite her illustrious pedigree created by Taxil, never existed.
*Ce fut la Sur Diana
Vaughan qu'Albert Pike,--afin de lui donner la plus grande
marque de confiance,--chargea d'apporter son encyclique luciférienne,
à Paris, pendant l'Exposition Universelle.
*It was the Sister Diana Vaughan that Albert Pike,--in order
to give her the greatest mark of confidence,--charged to carry
his luciferian encyclical, to Paris, during the Universal Exposition.
The hoax is well known and has been
explained time and time again for nearly a century. The New Catholic
Encyclopedia says this about Léo Taxil.
Taxil purported to reveal
the existence of "Palladium," the most secret Masonic
order, which practiced devilworship. He recounted the story of its
high priestess Diana Vaughan; and ended by publishing the Mémoires
d'une ex-Palladiste after her conversion to Catholicism. When
doubts began to spread, Taxil realized the time had come to end
the deceit. In a conference in Paris (April 19, 1897), he cynically
admitted his hoax, whose aim, he said, was to hold up Catholicism
to derision.(12)
After Taxil's public confession,
A. C. de la Rive expressed his disgust and recanted his writings on
Diana Vaughan in the April 1897 issue of Freemasonry Unmasked,
a magazine devoted to the destruction of the Craft. As much as he hated
Freemasonry, de la Rive had the integrity to admit Taxil's hoax.
With frightening cynicism the miserable person we shall not name
here [Taxil] declared before an assembly especially convened for him
that for twelve years he had prepared and carried out to the end the
most extraordinary and most sacrilegious of hoaxes. We have always
been careful to publish special articles concerning Palladism and
Diana Vaughan. We are now giving in this issue a complete list of
these articles, which can now be considered as not having existed.(13)
| Figure 5. Cover of Woman and Child in Universal Freemasonry, the most frequently quoted source of the "Luciferian Doctrine" falsely attributed to Albert Pike. Most of the quotes, however, have been plagiarized from Edith Starr Miller's Occult Theocracy. |
Morals
and Dogma Morals and Dogma is not available only from a "secret
publishing house,"(15) it is
not "the Bible of the Masons,"(16)
nor is it "the most readily available and universally approved
doctrinal book of Freemasonry."(17)
It is not even widely distributed or read. It is used only by the
Supreme Council 33°, Southern Jurisdiction, which in 1871 had
far less than 5% of American Masons as members and in 1993 claims
only 20%.
The preface gives the best understanding of how Pike and all succeeding
Supreme Councils have viewed his book.
The teachings of these
Readings are not sacramental, so far as they go beyond the realm
of Morality into those of other domains of Thought and Truth. The
Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite uses the word "Dogma"
in its true sense, of doctrine, or teaching; and is
not dogmatic in the odious sense of that term. Every one
is entirely free to reject and dissent from whatsoever herein may
seem to him to be untrue or unsound. It is only required of
him that he shall weigh what is taught, and give it fair hearing
and unprejudiced judgement. Of course, the ancient theosophic and
philosophic speculations are not embodied as part of the doctrines
of the Rite; but because it is of interest and profit to know
what the Ancient Intellect thought upon these subjects, and because
nothing so conclusively proves the radical difference between our
human and the animal nature, as the capacity of the human mind to
entertain such speculations in regard to itself and the Deity.(18)
This is not the way to introduce
the ultimate authority on any subject. Anti-Masons choose to ignore
the clear intent of the book and to distort Pike's personal opinions
into the absolute truth for all Masons.
One of the most frequently quoted passages by anti-Masons from Morals
and Dogma concerns Pike's theory that symbolic lodges exist to
hide the true secrets of Masonry from the masses.
The Blue Degrees [1º-3º]
are but the outer court or portico of the Temple. Part of the symbols
are displayed there to the Initiate, but he is intentionally misled
by false interpretations. It is not intended that he shall understand
them; but it is intended that he shall imagine he understands them.
Their true explication is reserved for the Adepts, the Princes of
Masonry. . . . It is well enough for the mass of those called Masons,
to imagine that all is contained in the Blue Degrees. . . . (19)
Anti-Masons would have us believe
this passage is a public admission of the deceptions imposed on most
Masons by the "leaders" of the Craft. Common sense is again
thrown out the window. Why would such a damaging "secret"
doctrine be printed in a widely available book? With hundreds of thousands
of copies distributed, shouldn't some blue lodge Masons have caught
on by now? Anyone, like Pike, is free to think he knows the true interpretation
of Masonic symbolism, but it will remain his personal opinion. Only
grand lodges have the authority to interpret the symbolism of the blue
lodge, and they are not inclined to yield to any other power.
Pike was simply repeating one of the currently popular theories about
the origins of the "high degrees." Just because Albert Pike
was a brilliant ritualist, an able administrator, and a well-respected
Mason doesn't mean all of his opinions are right. The Masonic encyclopedist,
Henry Wilson Coil, offers a good summary of the influences on Albert
Pike's Masonic writings.
Fate decided that Pike
should enter the Scottish Rite only four years after he became a
Mason and before he had time or occasion thoroughly to study the
history of all branches of the Society and, so, he began his study
from the upper levels without knowing much of the foundation. He
evidently did not know until his later life that the Scottish Rite
degrees were a part of that type of ritual which sprang up in France
in 1737 and subsequent years but regarded it as Primitive Masonry
which had come right on down from Greece, Asia Minor, and Egypt
and out of the Ancient Mysteries and Magism, which there held sway.
He found books which said so and he never had any doubt about that
theory. He regarded Craft Masonry as then known to be puerile, though
he said it had a deeper meaning which was hidden from its superficial
adepts, who were taught to be satisfied with trite explanations.
He even asserted that Craft Masonry had been devised so as not only
to hide its true meaning but to cause its members to think that
they understood it. [Albert G.] Mackey encouraged him in those notions,
for he, too, had been made a Mason only four years before he began
writing books on the subject, in which he adopted the more sensational
theories of mystery and symbolism. But Mackey changed his views
as soon as the work of the British realistic school began to be
felt. Pike did not waver; his work was nearly complete and too voluminous
to be done over. (20)
Few Masonic books have created as many
controversies as Albert Pike's Morals and Dogma. It is a collection
of thirty-two essays that represent Pike's interpretation of the lessons
of the Scottish Rite degrees. The essays are largely concerned with
the history of philosophy and with man's constant search for God. First
published in 1871, the book was given to every 32° Mason in the
Southern Jurisdiction for about a century; hundreds of thousands of
copies have been distributed. It is now out of print, though widely
available in used book stores.(14)
Link to Chapter Two: Anti-Masonry in the Electronic Age
Return to Masonic Anti-Defamation Page
FOOTNOTES
1. Robert A. Morey, The Truth About Masons, (Eugene Oreg.: Harvest House Publishers, 1993), p. 21.
3. "Freemasonry on Its Own Terms," The John Ankerberg Show, DM-170, 1986.
4. James L. Holly, The Southern Baptist Convention and Freemasonry, Vol. II (Beaumont, Tex.: Mission and Ministry to Men, 1992), pp. 46-51.
7. James L. Holly, The Southern Baptist Convention and Freemasonry (Beaumont, Tex.: Mission and Ministry to Men, 1992), p. 19.
8. Martin Short, Inside the Brotherhood (New York: Dorset, 1989), pp. 94-95.
9. Jack T. Chick, The Curse of Baphomet, Chino, Calif: Chick Publications, 1991, p. [10]. The general level of Mr. Chick's writing can be inferred by these comments on what he has written about Roman Catholicism. "[O]n the whole we feel that Chick Publications does more harm than they do good. Because of its lack of scholarship and, more importantly, Christian sympathy we can only conclude that Chick Publications promotes what can be called 'Comic-book theology,' something Christians ought to definitely avoid." (Hendrik H. Hanegraaff, "Chick Publications and Roman Catholicism," CRI Perspective, CP-0809 [San Juan Capistrano: Christian Research Institute, n.d.]).
10. C. Fred Kleinknecht, Washington, to Pat Robertson, Virginia Beach, Va., May 12, 1992, Typescript, Copy in the Archives of the Supreme Council 33º, S.J., Washington.
12. R. Limouzin-Lamothe, New Catholic Encyclopedia, s.v. "Taxil, Leo." Even with Taxil's exposure of the twin hoaxes of Diana Vaughan and the Palladium, entrepreneurs still try to sell this stale story to the gullible. "I was brought into Palladium Lodge (Resurrection, #13) in Chicago in the late 1970's and received the degree of 'Paladin' in that Lodge in 1981. . . ." (William Schnoebelen, Masonry: Beyond the Light, [Chino, Calif.: Chick Publications, 1991], p. 194.) It is interesting to note that Mr. Schnoebelen has combined two distinct and unrelated ideas in his tale, though both use similar sounding words. Palladium refers to a small statue of Pallas Athena which was thought to protect the city of Troy. Paladin is a type of European knight descended from Charlemagne's Counts Palatine.
13. Quoted in Alec Mellor, Strange Masonic Stories (Richmond, Va.: Macoy Publishing & Masonic Supply Co., Inc., 1982), p. 151.
14. While there are no plans to reprint Morals and Dogma, The Supreme Council 33º, S.J., has recently published two books to help readers better understand Pike's often dense prose: Rex R. Hutchens and Donald W. Monson, The Bible in Albert Pike's "Morals and Dogma" (Washington: The Supreme Council 33º, 1992) and Rex R. Hutchens, A Glossary to "Morals and Dogma" (Washington: The Supreme Council 33º, 1993). The Supreme Council 33º, S.J., sells used copies of Morals and Dogma when they can be obtained.
15. Ron Carlson, Freemasonry and the Masonic Lodge, preached by the author, audio cassette (Eden Prairie, Minn.: Christian Ministries International, n.d.), side 2, 34:18. N.B. The times listed are measured from the beginning of the audio and may vary slightly depending on the equipment used.
16. Ron Carlson, side 1, 4:41.
17. J. Edward Decker, Jr., The Question of Freemasonry (Issaquah, Wash.: Free the Masons Ministries, n.d.), p. 3.
18. Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, rev. ed. (Washington: Supreme Council 33°, S.J., 1950), p. iv, emphasis added.
20. Coil, s.v. "Pike, Albert."
Indiana Freemason's new forum dedicated to the future of the craft