|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is It True What They Say About FreeMasonry? Chapter Five: The
Reverend James Dayton Shaw, Art deHoyos and S. Brent Morris
TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE REVEREND If any think they are religious, and do not bridle their --James 1:26 Who should be better able to "reveal the secrets of the lodge" than a former Mason, especially one who achieved significant recognition within Masonry? This is the promise that The Deadly Deception holds out for its readers. The Reverend James D. Shaw and Mr. Tom McKenney coauthored this engaging book. It tells the story of Rev. Shaw, from becoming a Mason to joining the Scottish Rite to leaving the Fraternity. Rev. Shaw became a Christian and decided that it was his duty to "expose" Freemasonry to save other men from being victims of its deadly deception. The reader should expect a higher standard of accuracy from Rev. Shaw's story because of the years he spent in Masonry. The Cover of the Book
SHAW'S FIRST CLAIM. The full title of the book is The
Deadly Deception: Freemasonry Exposed by One of Its Top Leaders.
It is laughable to suggest that Rev. Shaw was ever a "top leader"
of Freemasonry. He served the Craft decently during his membership
and received recognition for his work, but he never attained any position
of prominence. Rev. Shaw's co-author, Tom C. McKenney, however, was
apparently embarrassed at this claim.
I would like to explain
to you that disputed "one of Masonry's top leaders" statement
in the subtitle. That was insisted upon by the publisher; I argued
against the word "top" for at least an hour on the phone,
but he had his way. At any rate, it is a completely imprecise term;
it could mean he was one of the top two, or one of the top two million
... but I'd like for you to know how it arrived in the subtitle,
which I though was much too lurid (I also argued against "exposed,"
but lost that one too).(82)
The claim, however, is harmless puffery,
well within acceptable limits for advertising. THE TRUTH
SHAW'S SECOND CLAIM. The cover claims Rev. Shaw was
"Past Worshipful Master, blue lodge." To be elected and
to serve as Master of a lodge is a great privilege and honor for any
Mason. By identifying himself as a Past Master, Rev. Shaw seeks to
establish himself as one who has achieved Masonic recognition through
hard work. As with so many of his statements about Masonry, the factual
record establishes something quite different.
Rev. Shaw received the First Degree in Masonry on September 11, 1945,
in Evergreen Lodge No. 713 in Indianapolis, Indiana. The Second
and Third Degrees were conferred by courtesy in Biscayne Bay Lodge
No. 124, Miami, Florida on May 21 and July 23, 1946. He transferred
his membership to Allapattah Lodge No. 271 in Florida on July
1, 1952, and remained a member until his resignation on October 25,
1966. He never held office in any Masonic lodge or affiliated body
in Indiana.(83)
In 1964 he was appointed Junior Steward of Allapattah Lodge, in 1965
he was appointed Junior Deacon, and on October 25, 1966, he resigned
from Masonry. The names of the principal elected officers of every
Florida lodge, the Master and Senior and Junior Wardens, are published
annually in the Proceedings of the Most Worshipful Grand Lodge
F.&A.M. of Florida. These Proceedings can be inspected
in any of the 300+ Florida lodges. The name of James Dayton Shaw never
appeared in the list of elected lodge officers. He was never elected
an officer in Allapattah Lodge, much less Master of the lodge. A
LIE
Officers
of Allapatah Lodge No. 271, F.&A.M. Extracted from the 1952-1967
SHAW'S FOURTH CLAIM.
Rev. Shaw was indeed invested with the rank and decoration of a Knight
Commander of the Court of Honour on December 18, 1965. The award was
honorably earned and is properly claimed on the cover of his book.
THE TRUTH
SHAW'S FIFTH CLAIM. The 33º is an important honor in the Scottish Rite, limited to about 1% of all Scottish Rite Masons. It cannot be applied for, and must be denied if requested. It can be falsely claimed, however, by anyone brazen enough to steal the title. This is what Rev. Shaw has done. Although he never provided the exact date, Rev. Shaw gave some hint as to the date of his alleged reception of the Thirty-third Degree. ...I had been a K.C.C.H. for only four years. A man cannot even be considered for the 33rd Degree until he has been a K.C.C.H. four years. I was being considered for the 33rd in the minimum time!(84) He resigned from Masonry on October
25, 1966, ten months after receiving his K.C.C.H. and thirty-seven
months before reaching the four year mark. In special circumstances
The Supreme Council, 33º, S.J., may wave the traditional four
year period between the K.C.C.H. and its bestowal of the Thirty-third
Degree. In such cases the recipient has performed an extraordinary
labor benefitting and/or honoring the Fraternity. The Supreme Council,
33º, N.M.J. may also wave its traditional period for similar
reasons. An example of the latter was the bestowal of the Honorary
Thirty-third Degree on John J. Robinson just before his death. Mr.
Robinson was a popular author and lecturer who publically defended
Freemasonry though not a Mason himself. Shortly after joining the
fraternity in 1993, when it became known that Robinson was terminally
ill, The Supreme Council, 33º, N.M.J. exercised its right to
confer the Honorary Thirty-third Degree on him, in recognition of
his extraordinary labors.
All Masons elected to the 33º have their names published in the Transactions of the Supreme Council. These volumes are easily available for inspection in any Scottish Rite body in the Southern Jurisdiction. The name of James Dayton Shaw was never listed as the recipient of the 33º, despite his claims to the contrary. YET ANOTHER LIE
SHAW'S SIXTH CLAIM. The upper right-hand corner of the book's cover has a bright red, eye-catching band with this come-on, "The 33rd Degree initiation ceremony revealed for the first time in history!" Rev. Shaw takes almost seven pages in the book to describe the events leading up to his so-called receipt of the 33º. The ceremony he describes is not based on his personal experience, but was rather been plagiarized from another source. The source Rev. Shaw selected was an exposé of the Cerneau 33º ritual in Jonathan Blanchard's Scotch Rite Masonry Illustrated, which has been in print since 1888. It helped Rev. Shaw in his deception that such sources are easy to come by. A casual search shows that authors have "revealed" versions of the Thirty-Third Degree initiation ceremony repeatedly since at least 1813. A partial listing is given below. "EXPOSURES" AND DESCRIPTIONS OF THE THIRTY-THIRD DEGREE 1813--"Souverain-Grand-Inspecteur-Général,"
in [François H. Stanislaus Delaunay], Thuileur des Trente-trois
Degrés de L'Ecossisme di Rit Ancien, dit Accepté,
Paris: Delaunay, Libraire, Palais-Royal, 1813, 1821.
1829--"Sovereign Grand Inspector General," in David
Bernard, Light on Masonry, Utica, N.Y.: William Williams,
1829.
1830--"Souverain Grand Inspecteur Général,"
in Vuillaume, Manuel Maçonnique ou Tuileur des Divers
Rites de Trente-trois Degrés de L'Ecossisme di Rit
Ancien, Maçonnerie Practiqués en France,
1830 (reprint ed.; Paris: Dervy-Livres, 1975)
1843--"Réception au 33ème degré,"
in F. T. B. Clavel, Histoire Pittoresque de la Franc-Maçonnerie,
Paris: N.p., 1843.
1857--"Sovereign Grand Inspector General," in Charles
Laffon de Ladebat, Thirty-Third Degree and Last of the Ancient
and Accepted Scotch Rite: Sovereign Grand Inspector General,
New Orleans: N.p., 1857.
1860--"Sovereign Grand Inspector General," in Jabez
Richardson, Richardson's Monitor of Free-Masonry, New York:
Fitzgerald, 1860.
1860--"Sobrano Gran Inspector General," in Andres Cassard,
Manual de la Masoneria, New York: Macoy, 1860.
1861--"Souverain Grand Inspecteur Général,"
in Jean-Baptiste Marie Ragon, Tuileur Général
de la Franc-Maçonnerie, ou Manuel de l'Initié,
Paris: Collignon, 1861.
1872--"Old Cahier of the 33rd Degree," in Albert Pike,
Grand Constitutions of Freemasonry, Ancient and Accepted Scottish
Rite, New York: Masonic Publishing Co., 1872.
1888--"Sovereign Grand Inspector General," in Jonathan
Blanchard, Scotch Rite Masonry Illustrated, 2 vols.,
Chicago: Ezra A. Cook, 1887-1888.
1890--"Sovereign Grand Inspector General," in Secret
Societies Illustrated, Chicago: Ezra A. Cook, ca. 1890.
1923--"Sovereign Grand Inspector-General," in Arthur
Edward Waite, A New Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, 2 vols.,
rev. ed., London: Rider & Co., 1923.
1933--"Official Ritual of the 33rd and Last Degree of Ancient
and Accepted Scottish Rite," in Paul Rosen, Satan et Cie,
Paris: 1888, excerpted in Edith Starr Miller, Occult Theocrasy,
2 vols., 1933, reprint, Hawthorn, Calif.: Christian Book
Club, 1968, 1976, 1980.
1933--"33d Degree--Knight Grand Inspector General,"
in W. J. Coombes, trans., E. J. Marconis de Negre, The Sanctuary
of Memphis or Hermes, [N.C.]: Nocalore, 1933.
1946--S. Farina, "Sovrano Grande Ispettore Generale"
in Il Libro Completo dei Rituali Massonici Rito Scozzese Antico
ed Accettato. Rome: n.p. 1946.
1984--"Soverain Grand Inspecteur Général,"
in Paul Naudon, Histoire, Rituels et Tuileur des Haut Grades
Maçonniques, Paris, Dervy-Livres, 1984. A naïve anti-Mason might be
forgiven for not knowing that the Thirty-Third Degree has been "exposed"
for the better part of two centuries. Rev. Shaw, however, obviously
knew about at least one such "exposure" because he lied
about receiving the degree. Not only did Rev. Shaw lie about receiving
the Thirty-Third Degree himself, he did not have the intellectual
integrity to cite the source he pilfered for his so-called description.
THE FOURTH LIE ON THE COVER
These lies could not have resulted from simple misunderstandings;
they were carefully calculated to deceive the trusting. Since at
least 1976, Rev. Shaw has been making similar claims, one assumes
to increase his importance in the eyes of his readers.
I was not willing to
be just a "card carrier." I was too eager for that.
So I served in all the chairs and ultimately became Worshipful
Master of the lodge. I pursued the degrees of the Scottish Rite
and joined the Shrine in my quest for preeminence in the eyes
of men. In time I became Past Master to all Scottish Rite Bodies.
And finally was selected for the coveted 33rd Degree, and was
made a 33rd Degree Mason in House of The Temple in Washington,
D.C.(85)
Before getting to even the first
page of The Deadly Deception, the reader is deliberately deceived
with four verifiable lies. They seem intended to boost the reputation
of Rev. Shaw as an important former Mason, to reinforce the believability
of his story, and to increase the sales of his book. They obviously
are not intended to promote the truth.
The Secretary greeted
me and explained the nature and structure of the Scottish Rite.
. . . He said that some men could not afford to take all
of the degrees at one Reunion because of the cost.1
1There is a price to be paid, in dollars,
for all "earned" Masonic degrees, from Entered Apprentice
to the 32nd Degree. Dollar values change with time and fees
vary some from place to place, but the total cost of going all
the way to the 32nd Degree can be very substantial, well into
the thousands of dollars today. It's not clear what the authors
intended by this aside, unless it was to suggest an extravagant waste
of money by Masons for initiation fees. A copy of Rev. Shaw's Scottish
Rite petition, dated August 14, 1952, shows the true state of affairs
(see Figure 11).
The cost in 1952 for the Fourth through Thirty-Second Degrees, "including Patent [membership certificate], [gold 14º] Ring, and Copy of Morals and Dogma" was $160. Rev. Shaw chose to purchase a 32º cap for $7.50. So his complete cost for joining the Miami Scottish Rite was $167.50. During his 15 years of membership, he paid a total of $107.50 in annual dues: $7.50 dues annually for 1953 to 1966 plus $2.50 pro rated dues for 1952 (see Figure 12).
The cost of joining the Scottish Rite in Miami has not kept pace with inflation. The fees in 1993 for the 432, including patent, 14 ring in a lucite pyramid, and a 32 cap is $200. Rex Hutchens's A Bridge to Light is now given to new members rather than Albert Pike's Morals and Dogma. Members wanting a 14 ring to wear must make a separate purchase. When joining Evergreen Lodge No. 713 in 1945, Rev. Shaw paid $50.00 in initiation fees for the 13, Entered Apprentice to Master Mason; his annual dues then were $7.00. By 1993 the initiation fees of Evergreen Lodge had risen to $125.00 and the annual dues had risen to $56.00. Rev. Shaw's entire cost for the 132 was $217.50 and his total annual dues then were $14.50. The cost now for the 132 is $325.00 and annual dues are $96.00. This is far from being "well into the thousands of dollars today." The Fourth Degree was
put on just like a play, with one candidate chosen from the class
to represent us all as he participated. The presentation went on
until time to take the oath at the end. At this time we were told
to stand, put our hands over our hearts and repeat the oath2
of obligation. . . .
2There was a blood-oath of obligation
for each degree, as in the Blue lodge.
This description of the twenty-nine
Scottish Rite obligations certainly sounds ominous, but it overlooks
a few niceties of fact. To start with, there have been no symbolic
physical penalties in the Scottish Rite, Southern Jurisdiction, since
about 1860, and there have never been any actual physical penalties.
Here is what Coil's Masonic Encyclopedia says about the matter.
Albert Pike, in revising
the rituals of the Southern Supreme Council of the Scottish Rite
about 18551860, completely eradicated all such penalties
from the degrees and substituted mental, moral, and symbolic condemnation,
and that example was followed in the Northern Jurisdiction of
the Scottish Rite about the middle of the 20th century.(86)
Rev. Shaw received the Scottish
Rite degrees and conferred them for years. He knows as well as any
Mason that there are no "blood oaths" in the Scottish Rite.
There was a great deal
of drinking at the Conclave and it bothered me. "Why must
we always do so much drinking?" I asked myself, but
had no answer. I enjoyed a little drinking and did it regularly.
But it bothered me that there was always so much of it
and that it played such a major role in the Masonic life.(87)
The Grand Lodge of Florida, like
most other American grand lodges, firmly forbids the sale or consumption
of alcohol at any lodge function. Here is the 1954 regulation on alcoholic
beverages that governed Florida lodges when Rev. Shaw joined.
28.06 (398) No particular
Lodge shall allow its properties or any part thereof to be used
for the purpose of conducting or carrying on a liquor business
or for the dispensing of alcoholic beverages in any form.(88)
In 1975 the regulation was unchanged,
though the following decision had been added to clarify the law. "The
serving of any intoxicating beverage in Masonic Temples or Lodge Rooms
or at Masonic banquets is forbidden by Masonic Law. (1969 Proc. 58,
212)"(89) Bro. William Wolf,
Grand Secretary of the Grand Lodge of Florida, summarized the 1993
rules governing alcohol in Florida lodges.
. . . the Grand Lodge
of Florida itself does not allow any alcoholic beverages in its
ceremonies or the sale or dispensing of any alcoholic beverages
on any property that it owns. Nor do we allow a function that
is held in a particular lodge or in the Grand Lodge to have any
alcoholic beverages for dispensing, such as Grand Master Homecomings,
Grand Lodge Dinners, etc.(90)
Equally explicit are the 1953 Statutes
of the Supreme Council, Southern Jurisdiction, to which the Scottish
Rite Bodies of Miami hold allegiance. "Art. XV §24. The
use of any spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors by any Body is hereby
prohibited..." (91)
Neither the Grand Lodge of Florida
nor the Supreme Council, S.J., permits alcoholic beverages to be used
by any of their subordinate bodies. Florida Masons are bewildered
when asked how alcohol "played such a major role in the Masonic
life," because there it has no role. What sort of meetings did
Rev. Shaw attend where they "always do so much drinking?"
It could not have been meetings of the blue lodges or the Scottish
Rite bodies in Florida. His statement is cleverly designed to leave
the reader with the impression that regular, heavy drinking is the
norm at Masonic gatherings.
The legend of Hiram Abif is a simple story, apparently based upon
Hiram the metalworker, mentioned in 1 Kings 7:13. In the Masonic
tale, Hiram is the master architect of King Solomon's Temple and
one of only three Master Masons, the others being King Solomon and
Hiram, King of Tyre. One day Hiram Abif is accosted by three Fellowcrafts
who demand the secrets of a Master Mason. Hiram refuses to betray
his trust and is murdered. The murderers are captured and executed.
After a search, Hiram's body is removed from its temporary grave
and reinterred in the Sanctum Sanctorum. (Such a burial never would
have been allowed under Jewish law, but that didn't stop the authors
of Masonic legend, who were familiar with the European practice
of burying dignitaries beneath the floors of a cathedral.)
The legend is a simple vehicle for teaching fidelity to a trust;
it has no basis in historical truth. It seems to have been introduced
into Masonic ceremonies shortly before 1730. The legend was first
published in 1730 in Masonry Dissected by Samuel Prichard,
an exposure of Masonic rituals.
In the Masonic legend the body of Hiram is taken from its temporary
grave so it can be given a more suitable burial. Rev. Shaw's description,
again, does not agree with the record: "Hiram was not only
brought up out of the grave but restored to life."(93)
The purpose of this subtle distortion isn't entirely clear, but
it seems to be to support Rev. Shaw's charge that Masonry teaches
a doctrine of reincarnation to its members.(94)
This teaching is offensive to Christians and, if true, would be
ample reason for a Christian to leave the lodge.
With the degree work
and other Masonic writings as our source, we finally decided that
the truth lay in reincarnation and that if we would try to live
a good life now, be good to our brother Masons, help the sick
and attend to good deeds in general, when we died we would enter
the next life on a higher plane--just like going through a door.(95)
This lie is best discredited by
Rev. Shaw's fellow anti-Masons who, in this case, have agreed with
Masonic writers. Since at least 1723, Masonic ritual has been "exposed"
in print, usually with the motives of embarrassing Masons, closing
lodges, and making money for the author. For over 250 years these
books have sought the same ends as Rev. Shaw, but they have told a
story that stands in contrast to his. We quote several representative
books to illustrate the consistent version of the Hiramic legend.
Rev. Shaw's motives here are unknown but, like his version of the
Hiramic legend, are not to be trusted.
Masonry Dissected, Samuel Prichard (London: 1730; reprint,
Bloomington, Ill.: The Masonic Book Club, 1977), pp. 28, 29.
Ex. What did King Solomon
say to all this? Light on Masonry, David
Bernard (Utica, N.Y.: William Williams, 1829), p. 81.
Q. What did they do
with the body? Three Distinct Knocks, anonymous
(London: 1760; reprint, Bloomington, Ill.: The Masonic Book Club,
1981), p. 61.
After this King Solomon
sent those 12 Crafts to raise their Master Hiram, in order that
he might be interred in Sanctum Sanctorum.
Jachin and Boaz, anonymous
(London: 1762; reprint, Bloomington, Ill.: The Masonic Book Club,
1981), p. 45.
When the Execution
was over, King Solomon sent for the Twelve Crafts, and desired
them to take the Body of Hiram up, in order that it might be interred
in a solemn Manner in the Sanctum Sanctorum.... Morgan's Freemasonry Exposed
and Explained, William Morgan (Batavia, [New York]: Printed for
the Author, 1826), pp. 88-89.
Q. What did they do
with the body? Secret Societies, Norman
MacKenzie (New York: Crescent Books, 1967), pp. 318, 319.
[King Solomon], when
the first emotions of his grief had subsided, ordered them to
return and raise our Master to such a sepulture, as became his
rank and exalted talents. . . . Our Master was ordered
to be reinterred as near to the Sanctum Sanctorum as the Israelitish
law would permit. . . .
The evidence is clear and consistent.
Anti-Masonic authors, all with the intent of harming Masonry, have
told the same story for over 250 years, which in this instance happens
to agree with what Masons have said. Hiram Abif was murdered and buried
in a hastily dug, temporary grave. His body was taken from the grave
to be reinterred in, or near (workings vary) the Sanctum Sanctorum.
There is no resurrection nor doctrine of reincarnation. The legend
of Hiram Abif is not the only thing Rev. Shaw misunderstood while
he was a Mason--Freemasonry teaches a reverence for truth to its members.
[ For photographs of Rev. Shaw's letter
of resignation, his KCCH dues card, Link to Chapter Six: T.N. ("Skip") Sampson and "Cornerstone Ministries" Return to Masonic Anti-Defamation Page 82. Tom C. McKenney, Ocean Springs, Miss., 31 Oct. 1996, to S. Brent Morris, Columbia, Md. 83. Rollin O. Simpson, Grand Secretary, F.&A.M., Indianapolis, Indiana, to S. Brent Morris, Columbia, Md., June 10, 1993, Typescript, In the possession of the author. 85. James D. Shaw, introduction to The Masonic Report by C. F. McQuaig (Norcross, Ga.: Answer Books and Tapes, 1976), n.p. 86. Henry W. Coil, et al., Coil's Masonic Encyclopedia (New York: Macoy Masonic Publishing and Masonic Supply Co., Inc., 1961, 1996), s.v. "Penalties, Masonic." 87. Jim Shaw and Tom McKenney, The Deadly Deception (Lafayette, La.: Huntington House, 1988), p. 83. 88. Grand Lodge of Florida, F.&A.M., Digest of the Masonic Law of Florida F.&A.M. (Tallahassee: Rose Printing Co., 1954), p. 157. 89. Grand Lodge of Florida, F.&A.M., Digest of the Masonic Law of Florida F.&A.M. (Jacksonville, Fla.: Grand Lodge F.&A.M., 1976), p. 245. 90. William G. Wolf, Gr. Secretary, Jacksonville, Fla. to S. Brent Morris, Columbia, Md., Nov. 18, 1992, in the possession of the author. 91. Statutes of the Supreme Council, ([Washington]: [Supreme Council, S.J.], October 1953), p. 60. The prohibition remains in the 1991 Statutes, though renumbered as Art. XV, §25. 93. Shaw and McKenney, p. 151. 94. Shaw and McKenney, pp. 8485. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indiana Freemasons & Demoley Chip Program [More Info] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Freemason lodges in Indiana & around the world [More info] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indiana Freemason's dues calculators [More info] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indiana Freemasons program to promote lodge attendence [More info] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indiana Freemason's new forum dedicated to the future of the craft [More Info] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||